Progressive Lunacy: PETA Claims Indonesian Monkey Owns ‘Selfie’ Copyright

21st Century Wire says…

You know that western society is approaching its final hour when animal rights activists start advocating individual animals to be able to sue humans in courts. That’s exactly what has happened in the US.

We can trace some of this line of thinking back to Cass Sunstein, the radical, liberal progressive technocrat and chief advisor to President Barack Obama (as well as the husband of disastrous UN Ambassador Samantha Power). According to his own writing and public declarations, Sunstein believes that activists should be able to bring a lawsuit on behalf of an animal in US courts. In his 2004 book Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions, Sunstein remarked:

Cass Sunstein.

“My simplest suggestion is that private citizens should be given the right to bring suits to prevent animals from being treated in a way that violates current law. I offer a recommendation that is theoretically modest but that should do a lot of practical good: laws designed to protect animals against cruelty and abuse should be amended and interpreted to give a private cause of action against those who violate them, so as to allow private people to supplement the efforts of public prosecutors. Somewhat more broadly, I will suggest that animals should be permitted to bring suit, with human beings as their representatives, to prevent violations of current law.”

As one of liberal America’s most influential technocrats, Sunstein argues that this legal right can be invoked on the basis of animal cruelty. While no cruelty seems to be present in the case of the “Monkey Selfie” (see story below), activists at PETA were no doubt emboldened by Sunstein and others who have propelled their ideological argument into public discourse.

While our society and our legal system are far from perfect, a move like this from a wealthy charity like PETA could throw that system into even further chaos.

Surely, if animals can sue humans, then shouldn’t humans be able to sue animals? As you can see, when you pursue this activist rabbit hole, reality starts to dissolve rather quickly.

More on this incredible story from AP…

Pictured here is a typical Indonesian Crested Black Macaque monkey (Image Credit: Lip Key Yap, Wikicommons)

Linda Wang
AP

curious monkey with a toothy grin and a knack for pressing a camera button was back in the spotlight Wednesday as a federal appeals court heard arguments on whether an animal can hold a copyright to selfie photos.

A 45-minute hearing before a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco attracted crowds of law students and curious citizens who often burst into laughter. The federal judges also chuckled at times at the novelty of the case, which involves a monkey in another country that is unaware of the fuss.

Andrew Dhuey, attorney for British nature photographer David Slater, said “monkey see, monkey sue” is not good law under any federal act.

Naruto is a free-living crested macaque who snapped perfectly framed selfies in 2011 that would make even the Kardashians proud.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals sued Slater and the San Francisco-based self-publishing company Blurb, which published a book called “Wildlife Personalities” that includes the monkey selfies, for copyright infringement. It sought a court order in 2015 allowing it to administer all proceeds from the photos taken in a wildlife reserve in Sulawesi, Indonesia to benefit the monkey.

Slater says the British copyright for the photos obtained by his company, Wildlife Personalities Ltd., should be honored…

Continue this story at AP/Chicago Tribune

READ MORE FINANCIAL NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Financial Files

SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV

Previous Multinational Capitalism is Multiculturalism’s Silent Partner
Next UK’s First State-Funded Muslim School Taken Over by Govt After Pro-Rape Books Found

About author

You might also like

Uncategorized 0 Comments

Mexico: 65% of Cops Fall Short in Performance Review

Almost two-thirds of police officers in Mexico were unable to demonstrate in a performance review that they are properly qualified or have the required competencies to protect the public, says a report by the Federal Auditor’s Office (ASF).
The review by the National Public Security System (SNSP) was aimed at addressing problems associated with the lack of training of police forces and the application of trustworthiness tests.
The ASF indicated that it had evaluated 99% of officers on active duty with the Professional Career Service and found that while 87% had passed integrity tests only 34.9% provided information regarding their training.
Consequently, the ASF said, “it was not possible to validate the competencies of the remaining 65.1% to carry out their duties in order to protect the public.”
The same report said 469,792 police officers were on active duty with the SNSP last year, which means that there are 3.8 officers for every 1,000 inhabitants.
Of those, 71.4% form part of the Professional Career Service and were identified as a priority for the application of trust evaluations by the ASF.
The ASF stressed that in response to its findings, the SNSP has implemented control mechanisms to ensure that trustworthy, truthful and timely information could be provided about their training programs.
Over 386 million pesos (US $21.5 million) were designated for training and evaluation programs for police officers in 2016 so as to strengthen public security institutions and improve security and justice.
The audit results also showed that the SNSP exceeded its training goals in 2016 by over 15%.
A total of 117,237 officers from all 32 states received initial, ongoing or command training in 948 different courses.
However, the federal auditor also established that the SNSP did not have a diagnosis of police training needs.
The post Mexico: 65% of Cops Fall Short in Performance Review appeared first on American Renaissance.

Uncategorized 0 Comments

US Treasury accuses Exxon Mobil of violating 2014 Russian sanctions

The U.S. Treasury Department accused Exxon Mobil of violating U.S. sanctions on Russia just weeks after they were imposed in 2014, as it hit the U.S oil and gas giant with a $2 million fine.
Exxon Mobil, whose chief executive at the time is now the U.S. secretary of state, pushed back strongly, calling the action "fundamentally unfair."
The violation, which the Treasury Department announced July 20, occurred in May 2014, just weeks after President Barack Obama announced the sanctions against Moscow for its annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea Peninsula.
Those sanctions targeted, among others, the Russian state-controlled oil company Rosneft and its chief executive, Igor Sechin.

Uncategorized 0 Comments

Hendrick Motorsports: Road to Race Day

An unvarnished look behind the scenes of the 2016 NASCAR season at Hendrick Motorsports.

       

0 Comments

No Comments Yet!

You can be first to comment this post!