10 YEARS ON: Putin’s Munich Speech Still Resonates

10 YEARS ON: Putin’s Munich Speech Still Resonates


1 Putin
Photo Illustration: Patrick Henningsen@21WIRE

Neil Clarke
RT OpEdge

February 2007. The month in which some 135 people were killed in a market bombing in Baghdad, the Indianapolis Colts beat the Chicago Bears in the Super Bowl, and President Putin delivered a speech at the Munich Conference on Security Policy.

It was a speech that made front page news across the world.

‘Putin rails against US foreign policy’ was the headline of the FT. ‘Putin says US is undermining global security’ was the splash of the New York Times. ‘Putin’s speech: Back to Cold War?’ asked the BBC. The World Socialist Website described the address, delivered in front of politicians, military officials, entrepreneurs and experts from more than 40 countries as “one of the most vociferous criticisms of Washington publicly voiced by the head of any major power.”

Ten years ago, there were probably quite a few people who – even after the debacle of Iraq – thought the Russian President had gone ‘over the top’ in his criticism of the way the US operated on the international stage.


.
Predictably, one of those who lambasted Putin’s speech was the neocon warmonger and then US Presidential hopeful John McCain, who sat in the front row with his eyes staring upwards at the ceiling while Putin addressed the conference. McCain said Russia’s foreign policy was opposed to the “principles of Western democracies.”

According to the Arizona Senator, it was Russia, not the US which needed to change its behavior. But almost everything Putin said at Munich was correct and has been borne out not only by what happened before February 2007, but what has occurred subsequently.

Take NATO’s Drang Nach Osten.

Putin told the audience that after the Berlin Wall had come down, because of “choices” made in Russia “in favor of democracy, freedom, and openness,” NATO Secretary General Manfred Woerner had said “the fact that we are ready not to place a NATO army outside of German territory gives the Soviet Union a firm security guarantee.”

However, such “firm security guarantees” from the West weren’t worth the paper they weren’t written on. NATO responded to the disbandment of the Warsaw Pact by becoming more – not less – aggressive. Not only was the Western military alliance expanded eastwards, ever closer toward Russia, but countries which were friendly toward Moscow, like the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, were deliberately destabilized and targeted for regime change.

We only have to imagine, as I wrote here, if the situation had been reversed and NATO – not the Warsaw Pact – had been dissolved in the early 90s. Imagine the consequences if Russia had subsequently sought to expand the Warsaw Pact to Mexico and Canada and bombed countries which did not want to become members like NATO bombed Yugoslavia. Would we now be talking of “American aggression”? I think not.

Putin warned his audience that “we are seeing a greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law.”

That was an explicit reference to the illegal US-led invasion of Iraq, which was sold to the public on the basis of an outrageous lie, namely that Iraq possessed WMDs that could be assembled within 45 minutes.

However, such “firm security guarantees” from the West weren’t worth the paper they weren’t written on. NATO responded to the disbandment of the Warsaw Pact by becoming more – not less – aggressive. Not only was the Western military alliance expanded eastwards, ever closer toward Russia, but countries which were friendly toward Moscow, like the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, were deliberately destabilized and targeted for regime change.

We only have to imagine, as I wrote here, if the situation had been reversed and NATO – not the Warsaw Pact – had been dissolved in the early 90s. Imagine the consequences if Russia had subsequently sought to expand the Warsaw Pact to Mexico and Canada and bombed countries which did not want to become members like NATO bombed Yugoslavia. Would we now be talking of “American aggression”? I think not.

 

Anger among the Western elite with the more assertive role that Moscow has played in international affairs since Putin’s speech ten years ago, and in particular Russia’s thwarting of neocon plans for Syria, has led to the imposition of sanctions by the US and the EU and the almost constant demonization of the country and its leadership. Attempts to intimidate Russia into “toeing the line” can also be seen in the recent NATO military build-ups on Russia’s borders, the largest since the Nazi invasion of 1941.

We must mention too, in this context, the media wars, and the none-too subtle attempts to get broadcasters like RT and Sputnik off-air for daring to present a non-NATO approved view of events.

However, as grim as all this sounds, the unipolar world President Putin described in 2007 is now over. Liberal interventionist columnists and defense industry-funded ‘experts’ might still rage against Russia in their weekly ‘Something Must Be Done!’ OpEds, (written in comfortable, centrally heated offices thousands of miles away from the war zones they helped to create), but events on the ground have turned against them…

Continue this article at RT

READ MORE RUSSIA NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Russia Files

Read Original Article HERE
View More HERE
View Morehttp://www.youtube.com/embed/U4MAsIh3zMA?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent HERE

Previous Homeland Security arrests South Carolina deputy for soliciting child pornography
Next FBI Investigating Identities of Violent UC Berkeley Rioters

About author

You might also like

21st Century Wire 0 Comments

SYRIA: Dispelling the ‘Sectarian Conflict’ Myth

http://www.youtube.com/embed/xjPpREHEF1Y?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent[object 3] says… The following is a video of one of the interviews, conducted by 21WIRE Associate Editor, Vanessa Beeley, during her time in Aleppo, observing the liberation of the

21st Century Wire 0 Comments

Grizzly Miss-Steppe: How Washington Post Rewrote its Fake News Story on ‘Russian Hack’ of Vermont Power Grid

http://bit.ly/2i5zqHR MEDIA MELTDOWN: Many now believe that Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos has transformed the Washington Post from a ‘paper of record’ into the world’s most expensive fake news blog. Kalev Leetaru

21st Century Wire 0 Comments

KNOWN WOLF & CLUB? EX-Deputy Head for Turkey’s MIT says Reina Attack Not Just the Work of a “Lone Wolf”

http://ift.tt/2jA7n3z Shawn Helton 21st Century Wire  The New Year’s Eve Reina Nightclub Shooting may not have been the work of a lone wolf  terrorist according to Cevet Ones, a former deputy head